Construction continues to tank, but we need a considered response not knee-jerk policies

Construction continues to tank, but we need a considered response not knee-jerk policies

The latest monthly construction output figures from the ONS for January provide little to surprise those who have been following their progress of late. They remain horribly worrying.

The figures show construction output in January adjusted for inflation down 6.3% on December and 7.9% down on January 2012.

Given there is no seasonal adjustment, it is best to measure output adjusted for inflation on a 12-month-rolling basis. On this measure output continues to slide with the annual size of the industry falling about £600 million in January.

The figures are pretty much consistent with suggestions by forecasters that we’ll see a decline in output this year.

But what is more worrying still is that the private sector is failing to show signs of life. The massive commercial sector in particular continues to grind downward. The sector was worth on an annualised basis £24 billion last January. It is now worth £21.5 billion.

Ironically public sector repair and maintenance appeared to be the most solid area for construction in the January figures. On an annualised basis public sector repair and maintenance is worth about £10.3 billion, pretty much what it was worth in January 2012.

The extremely disappointing figures have however created an upside for the industry. There have been increasing noises made of late by lobbyists, commentators and economists about expanding spending on infrastructure and housing.

Sadly these calls come rather late in the day and the solutions presented are often generic at best and very ill defined at worst.

Indeed they present a real danger that political expediency, the whims of economists poorly informed on the workings of the construction sector and pressure from lobbyists representing interested groups will drive the agenda, as sense departs and panic to patch up the grotesque growth figures takes over.

This, sadly, would be all too typical. We should have been spending time long ago working out where, when and how to spend money to build those things we really need for the future.

It is worth reinforcing the case for expanding construction during a recession. In a recession the public purse gets best value from construction.

Let’s by way of example look at why the nation should be building more homes now.

Firstly while there may be low market demand, there is plenty of evidence of need.

Secondly if you are going to need homes in the future it is worth building them now rather than later and here’s a quick argument as to why.

Crudely speaking labour represents about £40,000 in building a typical house. But you can pretty much halve that cost for the Government during a recession, because it will be taking people off the dole and out of benefits and those employed will then be paying employment taxes.

That kind of back-of-an-envelope calculation ignores the notion of the multiplier effect which is big with construction because it gets money to people who spend, it generates activity in other parts of the economy and it retains a skills base which makes future work more efficient.

Now here I must confess to getting a bit irritated with lazy thinking and the sadly fanciful precision given to the calculation over the exact multiplier effect from spending £1 on construction. The truth is that the iconic £2.84 per £1 spent may well actually be an underestimation of the impact of construction in a recession, because (lo and behold) the multiplier effect is bigger in recession.

But, back to the growing case being made to spend more money on construction, my instinctive reactions are:

1) great, let’s get spending on construction and hang the debt because you’ll have an asset to back it up;

2) how best and how effectively can we spend that money?

3) this is a great opportunity for construction to shine as an industry.

But my excitement is tempered, because some time ago I and others took the cracked record calling for sensible spending on construction off the turntable out of boredom and fear over my insanity. Though it gets a nostalgic hearing once in a while.

Insanity, they say, is to continue to do the same thing and expect a different result.

For the past four to five years I and others have banged on about the need to invest in construction as a mechanism for growth and as an opportunity to get fantastic value for the taxpayer. Nothing of note has changed.

Rather than repeat again my argument, can I just point you to one blog from October 2008? The thinking here I believe still holds, although the context will have changed.

The main point is that while spending on construction is good, just chucking money at it can be counterproductive in the long run.

I genuinely fear that a Government bereft of sense will listen to and base its policy on the ideas pushed by ill-informed economists or the lobbyists for interested parties. That is a distressing thought.

Fine this would lead to more construction. But we would miss a once in a generation opportunity to prove the point that spending on the right buildings and the right infrastructure really is a route to prosperity from depression.

3 thoughts on “Construction continues to tank, but we need a considered response not knee-jerk policies

  1. I agree totally that the government should be doing more to help the construction industry but if one looks at the recent financial results reported by the major housebuilders, all talk about the help being given by the government’s NewBuy, FirstBuy and Funding for Lending schemes.

    In fact, looking at their pre-tax profits per completion, all the majors are reporting their highest levels since the peak in 2007.

    Yes, we have a need for housing, and yes the house builders are now very profitable but what we have is a lack of affordability.

    The government is very happy to support investment which, in theory, does not show up on its balance sheet, that is private house building, but what is needed is much more public house building, that is affordable housing.

  2. Work with the RP’s – govt already funds them so all grant routes already in place (this will save some of the costs of distributing grant funding) on a local authority-wide basis (nothing to stop them grouping with neighbours) – LA commission a new local vernacular for each area working closely with RPs and local architects and other professionals. Then commission local bulders to manufacture offsite (this is important as it gives economies of scale and cuts down on build costs which in turn allows for increased quality). Then RP’s have access to cheap houses of better quality than many mass housebuilders. This in turn puts pressure on the housebuilders to improve their quality. I could go on but won’t!!

  3. How about opening up the Bank of England’s Funding for Lending scheme to housing associations?

    This should set the cat amongst the pigeons.

    If the banks see this money going elsewhere, maybe they will wake up.

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.